Doctrinal Analysis: Fiduciary Contracts (Mandato Fiduciario) and the Italian UBO Register

Subject: Analysis of UBO reporting obligations for contractual fiduciary arrangements and bare trusts (*Mandato fiduciario senza rappresentanza*) under Italian AML legislation.

Introduction

While the Italian UBO Register focuses heavily on trusts (*istituti giuridici affini*), it also captures contractual arrangements where assets are held by a professional fiduciary or a nominee for the benefit of a principal (*mandante*). In the Italian tradition, the *Mandato Fiduciario* is a bilateral contract that does not necessarily create a separate patrimony (unless specifically shielded), yet it triggers rigorous UBO disclosure requirements.

This briefing analyzes the intersection of contractual mandates and the "Special Section" of the UBO Register.

---

1. The Fiduciary Mandate (Mandato Fiduciario)

Under Italian law and international practice, a principal may task a fiduciary (*Società Fiduciaria*) with the administration of assets. The fiduciary holds legal title (or formal registration) while the principal retains the beneficial interest.

* The "Shadow" UBO: In these arrangements, the *Società Fiduciaria* is the formal legal owner, but the principal is the Ultimate Beneficial Owner.

* Reporting Trigger: Even if no formal "Trust Deed" exists, a written fiduciary mandate that grants the fiduciary the power to manage assets on behalf of another qualifies as a "similar legal arrangement" for the purposes of the UBO Register.

2. Bare Trusts and Nominee Arrangements

In common law jurisdictions, a "Bare Trust" is a simple arrangement where the trustee holds assets as a nominee, with no active duties other than to follow the instructions of the beneficiary.

* UBO Identification Mechanics: Because the beneficiary has an absolute, immediate right to both the income and the capital, the beneficiary is the sole UBO under the "ownership/interest" criterion.

* ATECO Classification: Such arrangements are often classified under ATECO Code 64.99.00 (Other financial service activities n.e.c.) when performed by professionals, or 66.19.30 for specialized fiduciary administration.

3. Escrow Agreements and Conditional Mandates

Escrow arrangements, where a third party holds assets pending the fulfillment of a condition, can inadvertently trigger UBO registration if the duration and nature of the control mirror a trust structure.

* The "Control" Test: The trustee must determine if the Escrow Agent holds "independent control" or if they are merely a temporary custodian.

* Strategic Risk: If an escrow arrangement is misclassified as a mere commercial contract rather than a fiduciary arrangement, the parties may face sanctions for non-disclosure in the Italian UBO Register once the nexus to Italy (e.g., holding Italian real estate or shares) is established.

---

Strategic Conclusion

The Italian regulatory environment is increasingly "substance over form." Whether an arrangement is titled a "Trust," a "Bare Trust," or a "Mandato Fiduciario," the reporting obligation remains constant: the natural person who ultimately owns or controls the assets must be disclosed. Practitioners must ensure that the Legal Nature Code 54 (Other Entities/Organizations) or the Activity Code 64.99.00 is correctly utilized to reflect these contractual fiduciary realities in the Italian Chamber of Commerce filings.